Is Julian de Medeiros Safe for Kids? Safety Score: F
@julianphilosophy · 112K subscribers · Graded October 8, 2026 · Based on 100 recent videos
@julianphilosophy · 112K subscribers · Graded October 8, 2026 · Based on 100 recent videos
I would not let my child watch this channel under any circumstances due to its consistently adult and explicit themes.
Best for ages Adults (18+). Not recommended under age 18. Acceptable for Adults (18+).
The content contains mature themes, explicit language, and complex philosophical discussions unsuitable for minors.
| Dimension | Score | Headline |
|---|---|---|
| Content Appropriateness | 0/25 | Content is highly inappropriate for children, discussing mature and explicit themes. |
| Shorts & Dopamine Factor | 25/25 | No Shorts content, focusing entirely on long-form, lecture-style videos. |
| Age Clarity | 0/25 | Content is clearly for adults, discussing complex philosophical and social topics. |
| Educational Value | 0/25 | No educational value for children; content is advanced academic philosophy. |
Content is highly inappropriate for children, discussing mature and explicit themes.
Many video titles explicitly mention topics like 'Porn Logic,' 'AI Masturbation,' 'Gooning,' 'Sexbots,' and 'Nudity in Gaming.' These themes are consistently present across recent uploads, making the channel unsuitable for any child audience.
No Shorts content, focusing entirely on long-form, lecture-style videos.
The channel has no Shorts and all recent uploads are long-form videos, typically over 30 minutes in duration. This format does not encourage addictive scrolling behavior, which is a positive aspect for intentional viewing.
Content is clearly for adults, discussing complex philosophical and social topics.
The channel's discussions involve advanced philosophical concepts, political commentary, and analyses of adult social phenomena. The language and subject matter are beyond the comprehension and interest of children, clearly targeting an adult audience.
No educational value for children; content is advanced academic philosophy.
While the channel offers academic discussions on philosophy and psychoanalysis, these topics are highly specialized and not designed for children's learning. There are no clear learning objectives or content suitable for child development.
This channel features long-form lectures on philosophy and psychoanalysis, often discussing contemporary social and political issues. The content is academic in nature and targets an adult audience interested in critical theory.
Parents need to understand that this channel frequently discusses explicit and mature topics, including sexuality, pornography, and violence, which are entirely inappropriate for children of any age.
I would not let my child watch this channel under any circumstances due to its consistently adult and explicit themes.
Do not allow children to access this channel, as its content is consistently explicit and intended for an adult audience.
How to be subject: Bryan Johnson/Self-Help/MAHA/Absurdism/Mosh Pits/Ethics vs. Morality
— Concern
This video's title includes 'Mosh Pits' and 'Absurdism,' indicating complex and potentially intense themes not suitable for children.
Charlie Kirk Death Anniversary/Sydney Sweeney/Porn Logic/Žižek/School Shootings/Postmodern Violence
— Concern
The title explicitly mentions 'Porn Logic,' 'School Shootings,' and 'Postmodern Violence,' which are highly inappropriate and disturbing topics for children.
I almost died/Porn/Masculinity/Žižek/Sexbots/Phallus/Marx
— Concern
This video's title directly references 'Porn,' 'Sexbots,' and 'Phallus,' making it unequivocally unsuitable for any child audience.
Gen Z vs. Millenial Porn/AI Masturbation/Brainrot/No-Fap/Žižek/How to be Subject
— Concern
The title contains explicit terms like 'Porn,' 'AI Masturbation,' and 'No-Fap,' which are entirely inappropriate for children.
Why Gen Z isn’t having Sex/Symbolic Castration/Gaming/Gooning/Žižek/Melancholia
— Concern
This video discusses 'Sex,' 'Symbolic Castration,' and 'Gooning,' which are mature and explicit topics not meant for children.
VidCove's Channel Safety Grader analyzes the 100 most recent videos on Julian de Medeiros using Google Gemini, scoring four independent dimensions on a 0–25 scale:
Julian de Medeiros's Shorts ratio in this sample is 0% — roughly 0 of the 100 videos sampled were Shorts. Reports are regenerated when channel content changes materially or after 180 days have passed.
VidCove lets you approve every channel before your child sees it. No algorithm. No Shorts. No recommendations. Just the channels you trust. Free 7-day trial — no credit card required.